Corrections
This commit is contained in:
parent
acd3e21305
commit
048deaf922
163
luku21.tex
163
luku21.tex
|
@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ because many questions involving integers
|
||||||
are very difficult to solve even if they
|
are very difficult to solve even if they
|
||||||
seem simple at first glance.
|
seem simple at first glance.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As an example, let's consider the following equation:
|
As an example, let us consider the following equation:
|
||||||
\[x^3 + y^3 + z^3 = 33\]
|
\[x^3 + y^3 + z^3 = 33\]
|
||||||
It's easy to find three real numbers $x$, $y$ and $z$
|
It is easy to find three real numbers $x$, $y$ and $z$
|
||||||
that satisfy the equation.
|
that satisfy the equation.
|
||||||
For example, we can choose
|
For example, we can choose
|
||||||
\[
|
\[
|
||||||
|
@ -28,9 +28,8 @@ is an open problem in number theory.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this chapter, we will focus on basic concepts
|
In this chapter, we will focus on basic concepts
|
||||||
and algorithms in number theory.
|
and algorithms in number theory.
|
||||||
We will start by discussing divisibility of numbers
|
Throughout the chapter, we will assume that all numbers
|
||||||
and important algorithms for primality testing
|
are integers, if not otherwise stated.
|
||||||
and factorization.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Primes and factors}
|
\section{Primes and factors}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -38,9 +37,8 @@ and factorization.
|
||||||
\index{factor}
|
\index{factor}
|
||||||
\index{divisor}
|
\index{divisor}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A number $a$ is a \key{factor} or \key{divisor} of a number $b$
|
A number $a$ is a \key{factor} or \key{divisor} of a number $b$
|
||||||
if $b$ is divisible by $a$.
|
if $a$ divides $b$.
|
||||||
If $a$ is a factor of $b$,
|
If $a$ is a factor of $b$,
|
||||||
we write $a \mid b$, and otherwise we write $a \nmid b$.
|
we write $a \mid b$, and otherwise we write $a \nmid b$.
|
||||||
For example, the factors of the number 24 are
|
For example, the factors of the number 24 are
|
||||||
|
@ -52,8 +50,8 @@ For example, the factors of the number 24 are
|
||||||
A number $n>1$ is a \key{prime}
|
A number $n>1$ is a \key{prime}
|
||||||
if its only positive factors are 1 and $n$.
|
if its only positive factors are 1 and $n$.
|
||||||
For example, the numbers 7, 19 and 41 are primes.
|
For example, the numbers 7, 19 and 41 are primes.
|
||||||
The number 35 is not a prime because it can be
|
The number 35 is not a prime, because it can be
|
||||||
divided into factors $5 \cdot 7 = 35$.
|
divided into the factors $5 \cdot 7 = 35$.
|
||||||
For each number $n>1$, there is a unique
|
For each number $n>1$, there is a unique
|
||||||
\key{prime factorization}
|
\key{prime factorization}
|
||||||
\[ n = p_1^{\alpha_1} p_2^{\alpha_2} \cdots p_k^{\alpha_k},\]
|
\[ n = p_1^{\alpha_1} p_2^{\alpha_2} \cdots p_k^{\alpha_k},\]
|
||||||
|
@ -75,7 +73,7 @@ The factors are
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The \key{sum of factors} of $n$ is
|
The \key{sum of factors} of $n$ is
|
||||||
\[\sigma(n)=\prod_{i=1}^k (1+p_i+\ldots+p_i^{\alpha_i}) = \prod_{i=1}^k \frac{p_i^{a_i+1}-1}{p_i-1},\]
|
\[\sigma(n)=\prod_{i=1}^k (1+p_i+\ldots+p_i^{\alpha_i}) = \prod_{i=1}^k \frac{p_i^{a_i+1}-1}{p_i-1},\]
|
||||||
where the latter form is based on the geometric sum formula.
|
where the latter formula is based on the geometric sum formula.
|
||||||
For example, the sum of factors of the number 84 is
|
For example, the sum of factors of the number 84 is
|
||||||
\[\sigma(84)=\frac{2^3-1}{2-1} \cdot \frac{3^2-1}{3-1} \cdot \frac{7^2-1}{7-1} = 7 \cdot 4 \cdot 8 = 224.\]
|
\[\sigma(84)=\frac{2^3-1}{2-1} \cdot \frac{3^2-1}{3-1} \cdot \frac{7^2-1}{7-1} = 7 \cdot 4 \cdot 8 = 224.\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -91,23 +89,23 @@ and the product of the factors is $\mu(84)=84^6=351298031616$.
|
||||||
\index{perfect number}
|
\index{perfect number}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A number $n$ is \key{perfect} if $n=\sigma(n)-n$,
|
A number $n$ is \key{perfect} if $n=\sigma(n)-n$,
|
||||||
i.e., the number equals the sum of its divisors
|
i.e., $n$ equals the sum of its divisors
|
||||||
between $1 \ldots n-1$.
|
between $1$ and $n-1$.
|
||||||
For example, the number 28 is perfect because
|
For example, the number 28 is perfect,
|
||||||
it equals the sum $1+2+4+7+14$.
|
because $28=1+2+4+7+14$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsubsection{Number of primes}
|
\subsubsection{Number of primes}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
It is easy to show that there is an infinite number
|
It is easy to show that there is an infinite number
|
||||||
of primes.
|
of primes.
|
||||||
If the number would be finite,
|
If the number of primes would be finite,
|
||||||
we could construct a set $P=\{p_1,p_2,\ldots,p_n\}$
|
we could construct a set $P=\{p_1,p_2,\ldots,p_n\}$
|
||||||
that contains all the primes.
|
that would contain all the primes.
|
||||||
For example, $p_1=2$, $p_2=3$, $p_3=5$, and so on.
|
For example, $p_1=2$, $p_2=3$, $p_3=5$, and so on.
|
||||||
However, using this set, we could form a new prime
|
However, using $P$, we could form a new prime
|
||||||
\[p_1 p_2 \cdots p_n+1\]
|
\[p_1 p_2 \cdots p_n+1\]
|
||||||
that is larger than all elements in $P$.
|
that is larger than all elements in $P$.
|
||||||
This is a contradiction, and the number of the primes
|
This is a contradiction, and the number of primes
|
||||||
has to be infinite.
|
has to be infinite.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsubsection{Density of primes}
|
\subsubsection{Density of primes}
|
||||||
|
@ -115,14 +113,14 @@ has to be infinite.
|
||||||
The density of primes means how often there are primes
|
The density of primes means how often there are primes
|
||||||
among the numbers.
|
among the numbers.
|
||||||
Let $\pi(n)$ denote the number of primes between
|
Let $\pi(n)$ denote the number of primes between
|
||||||
$1 \ldots n$. For example, $\pi(10)=4$ because
|
$1$ and $n$. For example, $\pi(10)=4$, because
|
||||||
there are 4 primes between $1 \ldots 10$: 2, 3, 5 and 7.
|
there are 4 primes between $1$ and $10$: 2, 3, 5 and 7.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
It's possible to show that
|
It is possible to show that
|
||||||
\[\pi(n) \approx \frac{n}{\ln n},\]
|
\[\pi(n) \approx \frac{n}{\ln n},\]
|
||||||
which means that primes appear quite often.
|
which means that primes are quite frequent.
|
||||||
For example, the number of primes between
|
For example, the number of primes between
|
||||||
$1 \ldots 10^6$ is $\pi(10^6)=78498$,
|
$1$ and $10^6$ is $\pi(10^6)=78498$,
|
||||||
and $10^6 / \ln 10^6 \approx 72382$.
|
and $10^6 / \ln 10^6 \approx 72382$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsubsection{Conjectures}
|
\subsubsection{Conjectures}
|
||||||
|
@ -138,7 +136,7 @@ For example, the following conjectures are famous:
|
||||||
Each even integer $n>2$ can be represented as a
|
Each even integer $n>2$ can be represented as a
|
||||||
sum $n=a+b$ so that both $a$ and $b$ are primes.
|
sum $n=a+b$ so that both $a$ and $b$ are primes.
|
||||||
\index{twin prime}
|
\index{twin prime}
|
||||||
\item \key{twin prime}:
|
\item \key{Twin prime conjecture}:
|
||||||
There is an infinite number of pairs
|
There is an infinite number of pairs
|
||||||
of the form $\{p,p+2\}$,
|
of the form $\{p,p+2\}$,
|
||||||
where both $p$ and $p+2$ are primes.
|
where both $p$ and $p+2$ are primes.
|
||||||
|
@ -153,15 +151,15 @@ $n^2$ and $(n+1)^2$, where $n$ is any positive integer.
|
||||||
If a number $n$ is not prime,
|
If a number $n$ is not prime,
|
||||||
it can be represented as a product $a \cdot b$,
|
it can be represented as a product $a \cdot b$,
|
||||||
where $a \le \sqrt n$ or $b \le \sqrt n$,
|
where $a \le \sqrt n$ or $b \le \sqrt n$,
|
||||||
so it certainly has a factor between $2 \ldots \sqrt n$.
|
so it certainly has a factor between $2$ and $\lfloor \sqrt n \rfloor$.
|
||||||
Using this observation, we can both test
|
Using this observation, we can both test
|
||||||
if a number is prime and find the prime factorization
|
if a number is prime and find the prime factorization
|
||||||
of a number in $O(\sqrt n)$ time.
|
of a number in $O(\sqrt n)$ time.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The following function \texttt{prime} checks
|
The following function \texttt{prime} checks
|
||||||
if the given number $n$ is prime.
|
if the given number $n$ is prime.
|
||||||
The function tries to divide the number by
|
The function attempts to divide $n$ by
|
||||||
all numbers between $2 \ldots \sqrt n$,
|
all numbers between $2$ and $\lfloor \sqrt n \rfloor$,
|
||||||
and if none of them divides $n$, then $n$ is prime.
|
and if none of them divides $n$, then $n$ is prime.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{lstlisting}
|
\begin{lstlisting}
|
||||||
|
@ -181,7 +179,7 @@ factorization of $n$.
|
||||||
The function divides $n$ by its prime factors,
|
The function divides $n$ by its prime factors,
|
||||||
and adds them to the vector.
|
and adds them to the vector.
|
||||||
The process ends when the remaining number $n$
|
The process ends when the remaining number $n$
|
||||||
has no factors between $2 \ldots \sqrt n$.
|
has no factors between $2$ and $\lfloor \sqrt n \rfloor$.
|
||||||
If $n>1$, it is prime and the last factor.
|
If $n>1$, it is prime and the last factor.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{lstlisting}
|
\begin{lstlisting}
|
||||||
|
@ -210,24 +208,24 @@ so the result of the function is $[2,2,2,3]$.
|
||||||
The \key{sieve of Eratosthenes} is a preprocessing
|
The \key{sieve of Eratosthenes} is a preprocessing
|
||||||
algorithm that builds an array using which we
|
algorithm that builds an array using which we
|
||||||
can efficiently check if a given number between $2 \ldots n$
|
can efficiently check if a given number between $2 \ldots n$
|
||||||
is prime and find one prime factor of the number.
|
is prime and, if it is not, find one prime factor of the number.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The algorithm builds an array $\texttt{a}$
|
The algorithm builds an array $\texttt{a}$
|
||||||
where indices $2,3,\ldots,n$ are used.
|
whose positions $2,3,\ldots,n$ are used.
|
||||||
The value $\texttt{a}[k]=0$ means
|
The value $\texttt{a}[k]=0$ means
|
||||||
that $k$ is prime,
|
that $k$ is prime,
|
||||||
and the value $\texttt{a}[k] \neq 0$
|
and the value $\texttt{a}[k] \neq 0$
|
||||||
means that $k$ is not a prime but one
|
means that $k$ is not a prime and one
|
||||||
of its prime factors is $\texttt{a}[k]$.
|
of its prime factors is $\texttt{a}[k]$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The algorithm iterates through the numbers
|
The algorithm iterates through the numbers
|
||||||
$2 \ldots n$ one by one.
|
$2 \ldots n$ one by one.
|
||||||
Always when a new prime $x$ is found,
|
Always when a new prime $x$ is found,
|
||||||
the algorithm records that the multiples
|
the algorithm records that the multiples
|
||||||
of $x$ ($2x,3x,4x,\ldots$) are not primes
|
of $x$ ($2x,3x,4x,\ldots$) are not primes,
|
||||||
because the number $x$ divides them.
|
because the number $x$ divides them.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For example, if $n=20$, the array becomes:
|
For example, if $n=20$, the array is as follows:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{center}
|
\begin{center}
|
||||||
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.7]
|
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.7]
|
||||||
|
@ -301,12 +299,12 @@ of the algorithm is the harmonic sum
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\[\sum_{x=2}^n n/x = n/2 + n/3 + n/4 + \cdots + n/n = O(n \log n).\]
|
\[\sum_{x=2}^n n/x = n/2 + n/3 + n/4 + \cdots + n/n = O(n \log n).\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In fact, the algorithm is even more efficient
|
In fact, the algorithm is even more efficient,
|
||||||
because the inner loop will be executed only if
|
because the inner loop will be executed only if
|
||||||
the number $x$ is prime.
|
the number $x$ is prime.
|
||||||
It can be shown that the time complexity of the
|
It can be shown that the time complexity of the
|
||||||
algorithm is only $O(n \log \log n)$
|
algorithm is only $O(n \log \log n)$,
|
||||||
that is very near to $O(n)$.
|
a complexity very near to $O(n)$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsubsection{Euclid's algorithm}
|
\subsubsection{Euclid's algorithm}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -331,7 +329,7 @@ are connected as follows:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\key{Euclid's algorithm} provides an efficient way
|
\key{Euclid's algorithm} provides an efficient way
|
||||||
to find the greatest common divisor of two numbers.
|
to find the greatest common divisor of two numbers.
|
||||||
The algorithm is based on the formula
|
The algorithm is based on the following formula:
|
||||||
\begin{equation*}
|
\begin{equation*}
|
||||||
\textrm{gcd}(a,b) = \begin{cases}
|
\textrm{gcd}(a,b) = \begin{cases}
|
||||||
a & b = 0\\
|
a & b = 0\\
|
||||||
|
@ -342,11 +340,9 @@ For example,
|
||||||
\[\textrm{gcd}(24,36) = \textrm{gcd}(36,24)
|
\[\textrm{gcd}(24,36) = \textrm{gcd}(36,24)
|
||||||
= \textrm{gcd}(24,12) = \textrm{gcd}(12,0)=12.\]
|
= \textrm{gcd}(24,12) = \textrm{gcd}(12,0)=12.\]
|
||||||
The time complexity of Euclid's algorithm
|
The time complexity of Euclid's algorithm
|
||||||
is $O(\log n)$ where $n=\min(a,b)$.
|
is $O(\log n)$, where $n=\min(a,b)$.
|
||||||
The worst case is when
|
The worst case for the algorithm is
|
||||||
$a$ and $b$ are successive Fibonacci numbers.
|
the case when $a$ and $b$ are consecutive Fibonacci numbers.
|
||||||
In this case, the algorithm goes through
|
|
||||||
all smaller Fibonacci numbers.
|
|
||||||
For example,
|
For example,
|
||||||
\[\textrm{gcd}(13,8)=\textrm{gcd}(8,5)
|
\[\textrm{gcd}(13,8)=\textrm{gcd}(8,5)
|
||||||
=\textrm{gcd}(5,3)=\textrm{gcd}(3,2)=\textrm{gcd}(2,1)=\textrm{gcd}(1,0)=1.\]
|
=\textrm{gcd}(5,3)=\textrm{gcd}(3,2)=\textrm{gcd}(2,1)=\textrm{gcd}(1,0)=1.\]
|
||||||
|
@ -356,18 +352,18 @@ For example,
|
||||||
\index{coprime}
|
\index{coprime}
|
||||||
\index{Euler's totient function}
|
\index{Euler's totient function}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Numbers $a$ and $b$ are coprime
|
Numbers $a$ and $b$ are \key{coprime}
|
||||||
if $\textrm{gcd}(a,b)=1$.
|
if $\textrm{gcd}(a,b)=1$.
|
||||||
\key{Euler's totient function} $\varphi(n)$
|
\key{Euler's totient function} $\varphi(n)$
|
||||||
returns the number of coprime numbers to $n$
|
returns the number of coprime numbers to $n$
|
||||||
between $1 \ldots n$.
|
between $1$ and $n$.
|
||||||
For example, $\varphi(12)=4$,
|
For example, $\varphi(12)=4$,
|
||||||
because the numbers 1, 5, 7 and 11
|
because the 1, 5, 7 and 11
|
||||||
are coprime to the number 12.
|
are coprime to 12.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The value of $\varphi(n)$ can be calculated
|
The value of $\varphi(n)$ can be calculated
|
||||||
using the prime factorization of $n$
|
from the prime factorization of $n$
|
||||||
by the formula
|
using the formula
|
||||||
\[ \varphi(n) = \prod_{i=1}^k p_i^{\alpha_i-1}(p_i-1). \]
|
\[ \varphi(n) = \prod_{i=1}^k p_i^{\alpha_i-1}(p_i-1). \]
|
||||||
For example, $\varphi(12)=2^1 \cdot (2-1) \cdot 3^0 \cdot (3-1)=4$.
|
For example, $\varphi(12)=2^1 \cdot (2-1) \cdot 3^0 \cdot (3-1)=4$.
|
||||||
Note that $\varphi(n)=n-1$ if $n$ is prime.
|
Note that $\varphi(n)=n-1$ if $n$ is prime.
|
||||||
|
@ -377,8 +373,8 @@ Note that $\varphi(n)=n-1$ if $n$ is prime.
|
||||||
\index{modular arithmetic}
|
\index{modular arithmetic}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In \key{modular arithmetic},
|
In \key{modular arithmetic},
|
||||||
the set of available numbers is restricted so
|
the set of available numbers is limited so
|
||||||
that only numbers $0,1,2,\ldots,m-1$ can be used
|
that only numbers $0,1,2,\ldots,m-1$ may be used,
|
||||||
where $m$ is a constant.
|
where $m$ is a constant.
|
||||||
Each number $x$ is
|
Each number $x$ is
|
||||||
represented by the number $x \bmod m$:
|
represented by the number $x \bmod m$:
|
||||||
|
@ -386,23 +382,22 @@ the remainder after dividing $x$ by $m$.
|
||||||
For example, if $m=17$, then $75$
|
For example, if $m=17$, then $75$
|
||||||
is represented by $75 \bmod 17 = 7$.
|
is represented by $75 \bmod 17 = 7$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Often we can take the remainder before doing a
|
Often we can take the remainder before doing
|
||||||
calculation.
|
calculations.
|
||||||
In particular, the following formulas can be used:
|
In particular, the following formulas can be used:
|
||||||
\[
|
\[
|
||||||
\begin{array}{rcl}
|
\begin{array}{rcl}
|
||||||
(x+y) \bmod m & = & (x \bmod m + y \bmod m) \bmod m \\
|
(x+y) \bmod m & = & (x \bmod m + y \bmod m) \bmod m \\
|
||||||
(x-y) \bmod m & = & (x \bmod m - y \bmod m) \bmod m \\
|
(x-y) \bmod m & = & (x \bmod m - y \bmod m) \bmod m \\
|
||||||
(x \cdot y) \bmod m & = & (x \bmod m \cdot y \bmod m) \bmod m \\
|
(x \cdot y) \bmod m & = & (x \bmod m \cdot y \bmod m) \bmod m \\
|
||||||
(x^k) \bmod m & = & (x \bmod m)^k \bmod m \\
|
x^n \bmod m & = & (x \bmod m)^n \bmod m \\
|
||||||
\end{array}
|
\end{array}
|
||||||
\]
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsubsection{Modular exponentiation}
|
\subsubsection{Modular exponentiation}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
There is often need to efficiently calculate
|
||||||
Often there is need to efficiently calculate
|
the value of $x^n \bmod m$.
|
||||||
the remainder of $x^n$.
|
|
||||||
This can be done in $O(\log n)$ time
|
This can be done in $O(\log n)$ time
|
||||||
using the following recursion:
|
using the following recursion:
|
||||||
\begin{equation*}
|
\begin{equation*}
|
||||||
|
@ -413,13 +408,13 @@ using the following recursion:
|
||||||
\end{cases}
|
\end{cases}
|
||||||
\end{equation*}
|
\end{equation*}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
It's important that in the case of an even $n$,
|
It is important that in the case of an even $n$,
|
||||||
the number $x^{n/2}$ is calculated only once.
|
the value of $x^{n/2}$ is calculated only once.
|
||||||
This guarantees that the time complexity of the
|
This guarantees that the time complexity of the
|
||||||
algorithm is $O(\log n)$ because $n$ is always halved
|
algorithm is $O(\log n)$, because $n$ is always halved
|
||||||
when it is even.
|
when it is even.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The following function calculates the number
|
The following function calculates the value of
|
||||||
$x^n \bmod m$:
|
$x^n \bmod m$:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{lstlisting}
|
\begin{lstlisting}
|
||||||
|
@ -438,12 +433,12 @@ int modpow(int x, int n, int m) {
|
||||||
\index{Euler's theorem}
|
\index{Euler's theorem}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\key{Fermat's theorem} states that
|
\key{Fermat's theorem} states that
|
||||||
\[x^{m-1} \bmod m = 1,\]
|
\[x^{m-1} \bmod m = 1\]
|
||||||
when $m$ is prime and $x$ and $m$ are coprime.
|
when $m$ is prime and $x$ and $m$ are coprime.
|
||||||
This also yields
|
This also yields
|
||||||
\[x^k \bmod m = x^{k \bmod (m-1)} \bmod m.\]
|
\[x^k \bmod m = x^{k \bmod (m-1)} \bmod m.\]
|
||||||
More generally, \key{Euler's theorem} states that
|
More generally, \key{Euler's theorem} states that
|
||||||
\[x^{\varphi(m)} \bmod m = 1,\]
|
\[x^{\varphi(m)} \bmod m = 1\]
|
||||||
when $x$ and $m$ are coprime.
|
when $x$ and $m$ are coprime.
|
||||||
Fermat's theorem follows from Euler's theorem,
|
Fermat's theorem follows from Euler's theorem,
|
||||||
because if $m$ is a prime, then $\varphi(m)=m-1$.
|
because if $m$ is a prime, then $\varphi(m)=m-1$.
|
||||||
|
@ -465,13 +460,13 @@ For example, to evaluate the value of $36/6 \bmod 17$,
|
||||||
we can use the formula $2 \cdot 3 \bmod 17$,
|
we can use the formula $2 \cdot 3 \bmod 17$,
|
||||||
because $36 \bmod 17 = 2$ and $6^{-1} \bmod 17 = 3$.
|
because $36 \bmod 17 = 2$ and $6^{-1} \bmod 17 = 3$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
However, a modular inverse doesn't always exist.
|
However, a modular inverse does not always exist.
|
||||||
For example, if $x=2$ and $m=4$, the equation
|
For example, if $x=2$ and $m=4$, the equation
|
||||||
\[ x x^{-1} \bmod m = 1. \]
|
\[ x x^{-1} \bmod m = 1 \]
|
||||||
can't be solved, because all multiples of the number 2
|
cannot be solved, because all multiples of the number 2
|
||||||
are even, and the remainder can never be 1 when $m=4$.
|
are even and the remainder can never be 1 when $m=4$.
|
||||||
It turns out that the number $x^{-1} \bmod m$ exists
|
It turns out that the value of $x^{-1} \bmod m$
|
||||||
exactly when $x$ and $m$ are coprime.
|
can be calculated exactly when $x$ and $m$ are coprime.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If a modular inverse exists, it can be
|
If a modular inverse exists, it can be
|
||||||
calculated using the formula
|
calculated using the formula
|
||||||
|
@ -500,14 +495,14 @@ so the numbers $x^{-1}$ and $x^{\varphi(m)-1}$ are equal.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsubsection{Computer arithmetic}
|
\subsubsection{Computer arithmetic}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In a computers, unsigned integers are represented modulo $2^k$
|
In programming, unsigned integers are represented modulo $2^k$,
|
||||||
where $k$ is the number of bits.
|
where $k$ is the number of bits of the data type.
|
||||||
A usual consequence of this is that a number wraps around
|
A usual consequence of this is that a number wraps around
|
||||||
if it becomes too large.
|
if it becomes too large.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For example, in C++, numbers of type \texttt{unsigned int}
|
For example, in C++, numbers of type \texttt{unsigned int}
|
||||||
are represented modulo $2^{32}$.
|
are represented modulo $2^{32}$.
|
||||||
The following code defines an \texttt{unsigned int}
|
The following code declares an \texttt{unsigned int}
|
||||||
variable whose value is $123456789$.
|
variable whose value is $123456789$.
|
||||||
After this, the value will be multiplied by itself,
|
After this, the value will be multiplied by itself,
|
||||||
and the result is
|
and the result is
|
||||||
|
@ -525,7 +520,7 @@ cout << x*x << "\n"; // 2537071545
|
||||||
A \key{Diophantine equation} is of the form
|
A \key{Diophantine equation} is of the form
|
||||||
\[ ax + by = c, \]
|
\[ ax + by = c, \]
|
||||||
where $a$, $b$ and $c$ are constants,
|
where $a$, $b$ and $c$ are constants,
|
||||||
and our tasks is to solve variables $x$ and $y$.
|
and we should find the values of $x$ and $y$.
|
||||||
Each number in the equation has to be an integer.
|
Each number in the equation has to be an integer.
|
||||||
For example, one solution for the equation
|
For example, one solution for the equation
|
||||||
$5x+2y=11$ is $x=3$ and $y=-2$.
|
$5x+2y=11$ is $x=3$ and $y=-2$.
|
||||||
|
@ -538,25 +533,25 @@ It turns out that we can extend Euclid's algorithm
|
||||||
so that it will find numbers $x$ and $y$
|
so that it will find numbers $x$ and $y$
|
||||||
that satisfy the following equation:
|
that satisfy the following equation:
|
||||||
\[
|
\[
|
||||||
ax + by = \textrm{syt}(a,b)
|
ax + by = \textrm{gcd}(a,b)
|
||||||
\]
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A Diophantine equation can be solved if
|
A Diophantine equation can be solved if
|
||||||
$c$ is divisible by
|
$c$ is divisible by
|
||||||
$\textrm{gcd}(a,b)$,
|
$\textrm{gcd}(a,b)$,
|
||||||
and otherwise it can't be solved.
|
and otherwise the equation cannot be solved.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\index{extended Euclid's algorithm}
|
\index{extended Euclid's algorithm}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsubsection*{Extended Euclid's algorithm}
|
\subsubsection*{Extended Euclid's algorithm}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As an example, let's find numbers $x$ and $y$
|
As an example, let us find numbers $x$ and $y$
|
||||||
that satisfy the following equation:
|
that satisfy the following equation:
|
||||||
\[
|
\[
|
||||||
39x + 15y = 12
|
39x + 15y = 12
|
||||||
\]
|
\]
|
||||||
The equation can be solved, because
|
The equation can be solved, because
|
||||||
$\textrm{syt}(39,15)=3$ and $3 \mid 12$.
|
$\textrm{gcd}(39,15)=3$ and $3 \mid 12$.
|
||||||
When Euclid's algorithm calculates the
|
When Euclid's algorithm calculates the
|
||||||
greatest common divisor of 39 and 15,
|
greatest common divisor of 39 and 15,
|
||||||
it produces the following sequence of function calls:
|
it produces the following sequence of function calls:
|
||||||
|
@ -580,15 +575,15 @@ and by multiplying this by 4, the result is
|
||||||
\[
|
\[
|
||||||
39 \cdot 8 + 15 \cdot (-20) = 12,
|
39 \cdot 8 + 15 \cdot (-20) = 12,
|
||||||
\]
|
\]
|
||||||
so a solution for the original equation is
|
so a solution for the equation is
|
||||||
$x=8$ and $y=-20$.
|
$x=8$ and $y=-20$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A solution for a Diophantine equation is not unique,
|
A solution for a Diophantine equation is not unique,
|
||||||
but we can form an infinite number of solutions
|
but we can form an infinite number of solutions
|
||||||
if we know one solution.
|
if we know one solution.
|
||||||
If the pair $(x,y)$ is a solution, then also the pair
|
If a pair $(x,y)$ is a solution, then also all pairs
|
||||||
\[(x+\frac{kb}{\textrm{gcd}(a,b)},y-\frac{ka}{\textrm{gcd}(a,b)})\]
|
\[(x+\frac{kb}{\textrm{gcd}(a,b)},y-\frac{ka}{\textrm{gcd}(a,b)})\]
|
||||||
is a solution where $k$ is any integer.
|
are solutions, where $k$ is any integer.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsubsection{Chinese remainder theorem}
|
\subsubsection{Chinese remainder theorem}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -656,7 +651,7 @@ as the sum $8^2+5^2+5^2+3^2$.
|
||||||
\key{Zeckendorf's theorem} states that every
|
\key{Zeckendorf's theorem} states that every
|
||||||
positive integer has a unique representation
|
positive integer has a unique representation
|
||||||
as a sum of Fibonacci numbers such that
|
as a sum of Fibonacci numbers such that
|
||||||
no two numbers are the same of successive
|
no two numbers are equal or consecutive
|
||||||
Fibonacci numbers.
|
Fibonacci numbers.
|
||||||
For example, the number 74 can be represented
|
For example, the number 74 can be represented
|
||||||
as the sum $55+13+5+1$.
|
as the sum $55+13+5+1$.
|
||||||
|
@ -685,7 +680,7 @@ all primitive Pythagorean triples.
|
||||||
Each such triple is of the form
|
Each such triple is of the form
|
||||||
\[(n^2-m^2,2nm,n^2+m^2),\]
|
\[(n^2-m^2,2nm,n^2+m^2),\]
|
||||||
where $0<m<n$, $n$ and $m$ are coprime
|
where $0<m<n$, $n$ and $m$ are coprime
|
||||||
and at least one of the numbers $n$ and $m$ is even.
|
and at least one of $n$ and $m$ is even.
|
||||||
For example, when $m=1$ and $n=2$, the formula
|
For example, when $m=1$ and $n=2$, the formula
|
||||||
produces the smallest Pythagorean triple
|
produces the smallest Pythagorean triple
|
||||||
\[(2^2-1^2,2\cdot2\cdot1,2^2+1^2)=(3,4,5).\]
|
\[(2^2-1^2,2\cdot2\cdot1,2^2+1^2)=(3,4,5).\]
|
||||||
|
@ -703,8 +698,8 @@ and the number 12 is not prime, because
|
||||||
\[11! \bmod 12 = 0 \neq 11.\]
|
\[11! \bmod 12 = 0 \neq 11.\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Hence, Wilson's theorem tells us whether a number
|
Hence, Wilson's theorem tells us whether a number
|
||||||
is prime. However, in practice, the formula can't be
|
is prime. However, in practice, the theorem cannot be
|
||||||
used for large values of $n$, because it's difficult
|
applied to large values of $n$, because it is difficult
|
||||||
to calculate the number $(n-1)!$ if $n$ is large.
|
to calculate the value of $(n-1)!$ when $n$ is large.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue