Corrections
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									37b767b135
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						84a65c4bab
					
				
							
								
								
									
										36
									
								
								luku20.tex
								
								
								
								
							
							
						
						
									
										36
									
								
								luku20.tex
								
								
								
								
							|  | @ -80,7 +80,7 @@ route the flow: | ||||||
| \end{center} | \end{center} | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| The notation $v/k$ means | The notation $v/k$ means | ||||||
| a flow of $v$ units is routed through | that a flow of $v$ units is routed through | ||||||
| an edge whose capacity is $k$ units. | an edge whose capacity is $k$ units. | ||||||
| The size of the flow is $7$, | The size of the flow is $7$, | ||||||
| because the source sends $3+4$ units of flow | because the source sends $3+4$ units of flow | ||||||
|  | @ -141,14 +141,14 @@ their total weight would be less than $7$. | ||||||
| \\\\ | \\\\ | ||||||
| It is not a coincidence that | It is not a coincidence that | ||||||
| both the size of the maximum flow and  | both the size of the maximum flow and  | ||||||
| the minimum cut is 7 in the above example. | the size of the minimum cut is 7 in the above example. | ||||||
| It turns out that the size of the maximum flow | It turns out that the size of the maximum flow | ||||||
| and the minimum cut is | and the minimum cut is | ||||||
| \emph{always} the same, | \emph{always} the same, | ||||||
| so the concepts are two sides of the same coin. | so the concepts are two sides of the same coin. | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| Next we will discuss the Ford–Fulkerson | Next we will discuss the Ford–Fulkerson | ||||||
| algorithm that can be used for finding | algorithm that can be used to find | ||||||
| the maximum flow and minimum cut of a graph. | the maximum flow and minimum cut of a graph. | ||||||
| The algorithm also helps us to understand | The algorithm also helps us to understand | ||||||
| \emph{why} they are equally large. | \emph{why} they are equally large. | ||||||
|  | @ -169,7 +169,7 @@ The algorithm uses a special representation | ||||||
| of the graph where each original edge has a reverse | of the graph where each original edge has a reverse | ||||||
| edge in another direction. | edge in another direction. | ||||||
| The weight of each edge indicates how much more flow | The weight of each edge indicates how much more flow | ||||||
| we might route through it. | we could route through it. | ||||||
| At the beginning of the algorithm, the weight of each original edge | At the beginning of the algorithm, the weight of each original edge | ||||||
| equals the capacity of the edge | equals the capacity of the edge | ||||||
| and the weight of each reverse edge is zero. | and the weight of each reverse edge is zero. | ||||||
|  | @ -254,7 +254,7 @@ For example, suppose we choose the following path: | ||||||
| After choosing the path, the flow increases by $x$ units, | After choosing the path, the flow increases by $x$ units, | ||||||
| where $x$ is the smallest edge weight on the path. | where $x$ is the smallest edge weight on the path. | ||||||
| In addition, the weight of each edge on the path | In addition, the weight of each edge on the path | ||||||
| decreases by $x$, and the weight of each reverse edge | decreases by $x$ and the weight of each reverse edge | ||||||
| increases by $x$. | increases by $x$. | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| In the above path, the weights of the | In the above path, the weights of the | ||||||
|  | @ -415,7 +415,7 @@ Hence, the algorithm terminates and the maximum flow is 7. | ||||||
| \subsubsection{Finding paths} | \subsubsection{Finding paths} | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| The Ford–Fulkerson algorithm does not specify | The Ford–Fulkerson algorithm does not specify | ||||||
| how paths that increase the flow should be chosen. | how we should choose the paths that increase the flow. | ||||||
| In any case, the algorithm will terminate sooner or later | In any case, the algorithm will terminate sooner or later | ||||||
| and correctly find the maximum flow. | and correctly find the maximum flow. | ||||||
| However, the efficiency of the algorithm depends on | However, the efficiency of the algorithm depends on | ||||||
|  | @ -426,7 +426,7 @@ Usually, this works well, but in the worst case, | ||||||
| each path only increases the flow by 1 | each path only increases the flow by 1 | ||||||
| and the algorithm is slow. | and the algorithm is slow. | ||||||
| Fortunately, we can avoid this situation | Fortunately, we can avoid this situation | ||||||
| by using one of the following algorithms: | by using one of the following techniques: | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| \index{Edmonds–Karp algorithm} | \index{Edmonds–Karp algorithm} | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|  | @ -553,7 +553,7 @@ any cut in the graph. | ||||||
| On the other hand, the Ford–Fulkerson algorithm | On the other hand, the Ford–Fulkerson algorithm | ||||||
| produces a flow that is \emph{exactly} as large | produces a flow that is \emph{exactly} as large | ||||||
| as a cut in the graph. | as a cut in the graph. | ||||||
| Thus, the flow has to be a maximum flow, | Thus, the flow has to be a maximum flow | ||||||
| and the cut has to be a minimum cut. | and the cut has to be a minimum cut. | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| \section{Disjoint paths} | \section{Disjoint paths} | ||||||
|  | @ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ If the condition of Hall's theorem does not hold, | ||||||
| the set $X$ provides an explanation \emph{why} | the set $X$ provides an explanation \emph{why} | ||||||
| we cannot form such a matching. | we cannot form such a matching. | ||||||
| Since $X$ contains more nodes than $f(X)$, | Since $X$ contains more nodes than $f(X)$, | ||||||
| there is no pair for all nodes in $X$. | there are no pairs for all nodes in $X$. | ||||||
| For example, in the above graph, both nodes 2 and 4 | For example, in the above graph, both nodes 2 and 4 | ||||||
| should be connected with node 7 which is not allowed. | should be connected with node 7 which is not allowed. | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|  | @ -1017,14 +1017,14 @@ should be connected with node 7 which is not allowed. | ||||||
| \index{minimum node cover} | \index{minimum node cover} | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| A \key{minimum node cover} of a graph | A \key{minimum node cover} of a graph | ||||||
| is a set of nodes such that each edge of the graph | is a minimum set of nodes such that each edge of the graph | ||||||
| has at least one node in the set. | has at least one endpoint in the set. | ||||||
| In a general graph, finding a minimum node cover | In a general graph, finding a minimum node cover | ||||||
| is a NP-hard problem. | is a NP-hard problem. | ||||||
| However, according to \key{Kőnig's theorem}, | However, if the graph is bipartite, | ||||||
|  | \key{Kőnig's theorem} tells us that | ||||||
| the size of a minimum node cover | the size of a minimum node cover | ||||||
| and the size of a maximum matching is always the same | and the size of a maximum matching are always equal. | ||||||
| if the graph is bipartite. |  | ||||||
| Thus, we can calculate the size of a minimum node cover | Thus, we can calculate the size of a minimum node cover | ||||||
| using a maximum flow algorithm. | using a maximum flow algorithm. | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|  | @ -1119,7 +1119,7 @@ set is as follows: | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| A \key{path cover} is a set of paths in a graph | A \key{path cover} is a set of paths in a graph | ||||||
| such that each node of the graph belongs to at least one path. | such that each node of the graph belongs to at least one path. | ||||||
| It turns out that in a directed, acyclic graph, | It turns out that in directed, acyclic graphs, | ||||||
| we can reduce the problem of finding a minimum | we can reduce the problem of finding a minimum | ||||||
| path cover to the problem of finding a maximum | path cover to the problem of finding a maximum | ||||||
| flow in another graph. | flow in another graph. | ||||||
|  | @ -1174,9 +1174,9 @@ Note that one of the paths only contains node 2, | ||||||
| so it is possible that a path does not contain any edges. | so it is possible that a path does not contain any edges. | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| We can find a minimum node-disjoint path cover | We can find a minimum node-disjoint path cover | ||||||
| by constructing a matching graph so that each node | by constructing a matching graph where each node | ||||||
| in the original graph corresponds to two | of the original graph is represented by | ||||||
| nodes in the matching graph: a left and right node. | two nodes: a left node and a right node. | ||||||
| There is an edge from a left node to a right node | There is an edge from a left node to a right node | ||||||
| if there is a such an edge in the original graph. | if there is a such an edge in the original graph. | ||||||
| In addition, the matching graph contains a source and a sink | In addition, the matching graph contains a source and a sink | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue