Update Code Jam statistics
This commit is contained in:
parent
c364de8cbd
commit
ab44c75fb9
|
@ -45,11 +45,11 @@ maintain them after the contest.
|
|||
|
||||
At the moment, the most popular programming
|
||||
languages used in contests are C++, Python and Java.
|
||||
For example, in Google Code Jam 2016,
|
||||
For example, in Google Code Jam 2017,
|
||||
among the best 3,000 participants,
|
||||
73 \% used C++,
|
||||
15 \% used Python and
|
||||
10 \% used Java \cite{goo16}.
|
||||
79 \% used C++,
|
||||
16 \% used Python and
|
||||
8 \% used Java \cite{goo17}.
|
||||
Some participants also used several languages.
|
||||
|
||||
Many people think that C++ is the best choice
|
||||
|
|
6
list.tex
6
list.tex
|
@ -153,9 +153,9 @@
|
|||
A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness},
|
||||
W. H. Freeman and Company, 1979.
|
||||
|
||||
\bibitem{goo16}
|
||||
Google Code Jam Statistics (2016),
|
||||
\url{https://www.go-hero.net/jam/16}
|
||||
\bibitem{goo17}
|
||||
Google Code Jam Statistics (2017),
|
||||
\url{https://www.go-hero.net/jam/17}
|
||||
|
||||
\bibitem{gro14}
|
||||
A. Grønlund and S. Pettie.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue